Side-by-side TER comparison · Divergence chart · Updated May 2026

Investment Fee Calculator

A 1.5% difference in annual fees sounds small. Over 30 years, it can silently eat 25–35% of your entire portfolio. Enter your investment details, set a low TER and a high TER, and see exactly how many rands the fee gap costs you.

Your investment

R 100 000

Starting amount — set to R0 if contributing from scratch.

R 2 000

What you add every month via debit order.

10.0%

Return before fees — 10% is a reasonable SA equity long-run assumption.

30 years

Time horizon in years.

Fee scenarios

Low-cost option — 0.50% TER

0.50%

SA quick-picks

Higher-cost option — 2.0% TER

2.0%

SA quick-picks

By choosing the lower-fee option you keep an extra

R 1 713 583

42% more in your pocket after 30 years

Low-cost: 0.50% TER

Final portfolio value
R 5 807 746
Net return rate
9.5%/yr
Fee drag vs no-fee
R 734 645
Total growth
R 4 987 746

Higher-cost: 2.0% TER

Final portfolio value
R 4 094 163
Net return rate
8.0%/yr
Fee drag vs no-fee
R 2 448 228
Total growth
R 3 274 163

Total you put in

R 820 000

Fee difference

1.5%/yr

Cost of that gap

R 1 713 583

Portfolio growth over time

Low feeHigh fee
R1.5mR2.9mR4.4mR5.8mYr 1Yr 5Yr 10Yr 15Yr 20Yr 25Yr 30

Shaded area = wealth lost to the fee difference. Monthly compounding, annuity-due.

Written by Rand Tools Editorial Team
Updated 5 May 2026

Data: TER presets from ASISA fund fact sheets, May 2026 · Annuity-due compound formula — standard financial mathematics · See methodology

How the calculation works

Both scenarios use the same annuity-due future-value formula as the compound interest calculator, but with the TER subtracted from the gross return: net return = gross return − TER. A gross return of 10% with a 2% TER gives a net return of 8% — and that 2% compounds against you every year.

The fee drag shown for each scenario is the difference between a theoretical zero-fee outcome and the actual outcome. It represents the wealth you surrendered to fees. The saving by going low-cost is simply the difference between the two net-of-fee final balances.

The divergence chart shows how the two portfolios separate over time. The shaded area between the lines is the accumulated fee cost — notice how it accelerates in later years. This is fee drag compounding on itself: you lose not just the fee each year, but all the future growth that fee would have generated.

Real SA scenarios

Four worked comparisons for typical South African investors. All assume 10% gross return, monthly compounding.

TFSA: ETF vs active fund

R2k/month · 30 years · 0.3% vs 2.0%

You keep extra~R780,000

Funding a TFSA with a Satrix 40 ETF vs a typical active balanced fund. The fee difference is almost a year's salary.

RA: passive vs legacy product

R3k/month · 35 years · 0.8% vs 3.0%

You keep extra~R1,900,000

A R3k/month RA over 35 years. High-cost legacy RA products can cost close to R2m compared to a modern passive RA.

Lump sum: index vs active

R500k lump sum · 20 years · 0.5% vs 2.5%

You keep extra~R750,000

A R500,000 windfall invested for 20 years. The 2% fee difference costs more than the original lump sum.

Side hustle savings

R1k/month · 20 years · 0.5% vs 1.5%

You keep extra~R120,000

Even on smaller amounts, a 1% fee gap compounds to serious money. R1k/month, one extra percent, 20 years: R120k.

Frequently asked questions

What is a TER and why does it matter so much?

TER stands for Total Expense Ratio — the annual percentage of your investment deducted to cover fund management, administration, and performance fees. A TER of 2% means R200 is taken from every R10,000 in your portfolio every year, whether the fund goes up or down. That sounds small, but because it compounds against you (you lose not just the fee but the future growth of that fee), even a 1.5% difference in TER can cost you 20–30% of your eventual portfolio over 30 years. The calculator above shows the exact rand figure.

What is a typical TER for SA unit trusts and ETFs?

As of 2026: SA index ETFs (Satrix, CoreShares, Sygnia Itrix) charge TERs of 0.1–0.5% per year. Passive balanced funds (10X, Sygnia, Allan Gray Index) charge 0.4–0.9%. Actively managed unit trusts (Allan Gray, Coronation, Ninety One) typically charge 1.5–2.5%. If you use a financial advisor who charges 0.5–1% on assets under management, add that to the fund TER to get your total investment charge (TIC). The difference between a 0.5% TIC and a 2.5% TIC is exactly what this calculator models.

Do higher fees mean better performance?

Decades of global evidence — and mounting SA evidence — say no, on average. S&P's SPIVA reports consistently show most actively managed SA funds underperform their benchmark index over 10+ year periods, after fees. A 2% active fund that beats its benchmark by 1% still costs you 1% more than an index fund — and that gap is guaranteed while the outperformance is not. This is why the FSB/FSCA now requires funds to disclose TERs prominently: fees are the one investment cost you can control.

Should I always choose the lowest fee fund?

Not necessarily. The lowest-fee fund isn't always right: if your TFSA only offers one fund option, you may not have a choice; some asset managers' active funds have genuinely delivered long-run outperformance net of fees (Allan Gray Balanced, for example); and a cheap fund in the wrong asset class is worse than a pricier fund in the right one. The main point of this calculator is to make the fee cost visible — most South Africans have no idea a 1.5% fee difference costs them R500,000+ over 30 years. Once you see the number, you can make an informed choice.

What is the difference between TER and TIC?

TER (Total Expense Ratio) covers the costs inside the fund itself: management fee, audit, custody, performance fee. TIC (Total Investment Cost) includes TER plus all the costs outside the fund: advisor fees, platform fees, and transaction costs. ASISA (the Association for Savings and Investment South Africa) now requires disclosure of TIC alongside TER. When comparing products, always use TIC. The calculator defaults let you model both — set the 'high fee' scenario to a fund's TIC rather than just its TER to see the full picture.

What gross return should I assume?

For a balanced fund or TFSA invested in SA equities, 9–11% per year is a reasonable long-run assumption based on historical JSE returns. Satrix 40 ETF has returned ~11% p.a. over the past 10 years (nominal). Note: the gross return is what the market delivers before any fees. The net return — what you actually earn — is gross minus your TER/TIC. Always compare net returns, not gross.

Does this calculator apply to retirement annuities (RAs)?

Yes, and RA fee drag is especially important because RA money is locked away until age 55. A R2,000/month RA contribution over 35 years at 10% gross return loses approximately R1.5m in wealth by choosing a 2.5% TER fund over a 0.5% TER fund — nearly two years' worth of final distributions. SA regulations now cap RA fees (the Regulation 28 TIC cap was introduced to address this), but many older RA policies still carry high charges. If you're in an older RA, it's worth modelling the switch cost.

Is this the same as the 1% fee impact rule of thumb?

The common rule of thumb is '1% in fees costs you 20–25% of your wealth over 30 years.' The calculator above is more precise: it depends on your actual gross return, time horizon, and contribution pattern. At a 10% gross return over 30 years with R2,000/month, the rule holds fairly well. But at shorter horizons (10–15 years) or lower gross returns (7–8%), the impact of 1% in fees is proportionally larger. Run your own numbers rather than relying on the rule.

Sources: TER benchmarks from ASISA published fund fact sheets (May 2026). SA equity long-run return assumptions from Allan Gray, Coronation, and Ninety One published fact sheets. The annuity-due compound formula is standard financial mathematics. This calculator models TER impact using a net-of-fees return approximation — actual fee structures may vary. Not financial advice; consult a qualified financial planner before switching products.

Was this page helpful?